What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell System?

If you’ve ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes, but they’re actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they’re not as visible however, they could cause problems for people.
It is the FCC’s Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC’s Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It’s usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC’s Maximum Exposure Thresholds

Have you ever used a cell phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away you are from it.

While it sounds like something that’s good but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For safe distance to live from cell phone tower , a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.

This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body’s outer layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC’s Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC’s Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon many assumptions that aren’t supported by evidence from science. safe distance from cell tower includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn’t be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This could result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.

Posted in Emf

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *